Show the readings and decisions behind your water order.
Turn sensor readings and field checks into a weekly draft order. You, your agronomist or our agronomist on Managed reviews and issues it. Reading summaries are signed into a record that is tamper-evident from signing forward; it does not show that a measurement was accurate or that a regulator accepted it.
Each issued order is kept with the readings behind it.
The weekly workflow
Every week, the same loop.
A written Monday briefing, a Thursday draft water order in pump hours and inches, and the review that turns the draft into the order. The draft comes from the water balance on your own probes, pump and CIMIS; the trained models add stress risk, water-use estimates and probe-health flags per block as that block's field labels accrue.
Step 1
See what needs checking.
Review the block queue and the reason for each flag.
Step 2
Bring the field reading in.
Confirm the reading and keep it with the visit record.
Step 3
Review and issue the order.
Check the draft, record the decision and share the plan.
Who issues the order is your choice: you, your own agronomist, or on Managed, our agronomist. Reading summaries are signed into a tamper-evident record. Since Sep 3, 2026, on the farms in our order pilot, the draft order is held back and logged in a hash-linked record before the adviser makes the call; the issued order is kept with the readings behind it. What follows on this page is that record.
Every morning
Where each block stands: water used, allocation left, and soil moisture by depth.
Every report
Water use against your allocation every week. Exports in the format your GSA files in are coming. Always verify official numbers with your GSA.
Your approved order
Each issued order is kept with the signed reading summaries behind it. Those summaries are tamper-evident from signing forward. That's the part the rest of this page explains.
How the verification chain works
From soil sensor to tamper-evident record.
The report retains the evidence behind the issued order. Reading summaries are signed into the record, tamper-evident from signing forward. Later changes can be checked. It does not by itself prove water savings, establish additionality, create a credit, or replace independent methodology verification. No credit revenue is included in the product value today. Patent-pending verification.
Sensor → signed reading summaries → agronomist review → issued order, kept with its readings
Honest by design
Sample data is labeled sample. Estimates are labeled estimates. We report the test method and its limits.
We are checking salt signals against plant measurements. Until that work is complete, they remain supporting evidence for field review.
What If My Sensor Goes Offline?
IrriMAX sensors occasionally lose connectivity. Here is exactly what happens.
Short Outage
We estimate your readings using your last known data plus official CIMIS weather station data.
→ Marked as an estimate in your record.
Long Outage
We use historical data from the same period in prior years (requires 3+ years of data).
→ Marked as a historical estimate in your record, with the higher uncertainty noted.
Extended Outage
We declare the gap. Nothing is estimated for that period.
→ Marked as a gap in your record.
Gaps stay labeled. An estimate is never relabeled as a live reading after the fact.
Ready to Get Started?
Tell us about your operation. We'll send back a quote and a path that fits your basin.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who can see my sensor data?
What could water credits be worth?
How accurate are the water-use estimates?
Is the patent approved?
Patent-pending verification technology